A Bear Flag Revolt revolt in Sonoma
Each June, for as far back as anyone can remember, a merry band of local performers has re-enacted what’s known as the Bear Flag Revolt of June 14, 1846.
That revolt – where a cadre of riled-up American settlers deposed and imprisoned Mexican Gen. Mariano Vallejo and hoisted the rebel “bear flag” that still flies over the city – sought to annex Sonoma as an independent republic. Instead, the fledgling republic was subsumed almost immediately as United States territory, followed, in short order, by the rest of California.
The revolt was the fulcrum upon which California history pivoted, a political coup where an inestimable prize was commandeered in a ruckus. And its semi-regular re-enactment over the years at various local festivals remains endlessly fascinating to historians and some locals.
This weekend, the latest re-enactment takes place Sunday, June 10, at 1 p.m. in the Grinstead Amphitheatre, as part of the nonprofit Native Sons of the Golden West’s annual Chicken BBQ and Wine Tasting fundraiser, from noon to 4 p.m on the Plaza.
But who were the so-called Bear Flaggers, and what really happened that fateful day in 1846?
As Gen. Vallejo’s son, Platon Vallejo, wrote to his brother in 1916, “The changes in California were so fast and so dramatic that many opinions and viewpoints have been issued.”
And they’re still being issued to this day.
In an op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times in 2015, writer and California historian Alex Abella described the Bear Flaggers as, “a band of thieves, drunks and murderers (who) hoisted a home-made flag and declared themselves in revolt from a government that had welcomed them.”
To Abella, the rebellion was less about patriotism than it was an Anglo-cultural land grab.
While Abella is particularly harsh on the Bear Flaggers – he has called for California to replace the Bear Flag as its official state banner – most California historians are in general agreement: the Bear Flaggers were an unsavory lot. Essentially, the gang was made up of 30-some guys with no military discipline who were whipped into a frenzy by U.S. Army Capt. John C. Fremont and took action against a non-confrontational local military leader who a little more than a decade prior had founded the “Pueblo de Sonoma,” where we live today. It’s also true – as the various local reenactments typically demonstrate – that they got pretty oiled the night they captured Gen. Vallejo, and that many stayed drunk through their brief, bloodless rebellion.
Still, others argue that the Bear Flaggers were also in a state of grave uncertainty, with their futures – and perhaps even their lives – in jeopardy. “There were rumors of the Native Americans being stirred up by the (Mexican) Californios to burn the crops of the settlers,” Sonoma historian Peter Meyerhof told the Index-Tribune.
But to Juan Hernandez, executive director of La Luz Center, the Valley nonprofit which serves a large segment of the Latino community, the Bear Flaggers are a symbol of the 19th century doctrine of “Manifest Destiny,” a belief that American expansion across the continent was as rightful as it was inevitable.
“This revolt,” says Hernandez, was born of a racist belief, “which maintained that the United States was destined – by God, its advocates believed – to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.”
Added Hernandez, “If you were Native American and/or Mexican, then you were the first victims of the violent conquest provoked by the Bear Flaggers.”
Hernandez views the Bear Flaggers as having thrown the opening salvo to an era that would see the majority of California’s approximately 150,000 Native Americans dead within a few short years.
Hernandez concedes he’s somewhat perplexed that Sonoma still stages the Bear Flag re-enactment.
In an era when America’s history is being examined anew, Hernandez - and others who have contacted the Index-Tribune – see Sonoma’s Bear Flag re-enactment as a glorification of a dark past.
But for George Webber, who wrote the Bear Flag re-enactment script 14 years ago in what he describes as “a fit of volunteerism,” the revolt’s aftermath and the actions that incited it are separate histories that should not be conflated.
Besides which, to Webber’s mind, the facts are the facts.
“History is rarely pretty,” said Webber. “People who consider the ‘right-mindedness’ of historical actions must be careful not to apply historical revisionism to their opinions.”
Given the complexity of the history in question, Webber is puzzled by the anti-Bear Flag faction.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: