Fair   62.0F  |  Forecast »
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print

Setting the record straight

Feb 7, 2013 - 03:18 PM

Editor, Index-Tribune:

    

  Thanks to Bob Edwards for setting the historical record straight regarding the slaughter of the Lakota Indian tribes at Wounded Knee in 1890 (Valley Forum Feb. 5, “The real lesson from Wounded Knee”).

  Indeed, Native American tribes across the North American continent were armed during the almost 300 years of wars of white occupation – later, many with guns – for all the good it did them. Their being armed did not stop the massacre of millions, their lands taken and their 10,000-year-old cultures all but wiped out.

  The point: Their guns and other weapons were practically useless in the face of much greater numbers with more sophisticated weaponry.

  The argument that Americans need guns to resist a government bent on disarming and persecuting them is quite absurd. The U.S. government has the most advanced weaponry and training in its armed forces. What good would some rifles and handguns do in the face of that?

  The Second Amendment references arms for “… a well-regulated militia.” Such exists. The states call them national guards. It’s suggested to those who feel drawn to guns and the need to shoot them to join the U.S. military or the California National Guard. That’s the proper place for assault rifles and all the weaponry some feel is needed to settle disputes.

  Better yet, practice peaceful solutions and settle differences without resorting to violence, and maybe some day humans will learn to live differently. A guy named Gandhi defeated the British Empire without firing a shot. Anything’s possible.

  Will Shonbrun

  Boyes Hot Springs

  

Please note: Your full name will be published with your comment.

Old to new | New to old
Feb 8, 2013 09:44 am
 Posted by  Wayne Hardy

Of course the United States government can "out gun"
the citizens of this country. That does not take away
from the founding fathers original intent in drafting
the 2nd Amnd. They did NOT want weapons ONLY in the
hands of the government. End of story!! Whether who
can "out gun" who is not important.

For those of you who think guns should only be in the
hands of a "well regulated militia" I have a question
for you. Through out the early beginings of this country
people carried firearms with them in open display. They
carried them in the stores, the salons and walking through
the streets. I don't recall ever reading where a town
sheriff ran around asking to see a "militia card" for
everyone who was seen carrying a gun. If only people
who were part of a "well regulated militia" were allowed
to carry guns why have we not heard..or read.. about it
in the annals of American history?? I will tell you why!
Because it was common knowledge back then how the 2nd
Amnmd was meant to be interpretated. They knew that it
was the,"right of the people to keep and bear arms".
I don't ever remember in a John Wayne western movie
where some sheriff ran up to the Duke and said, "sir..
can I see your militia card for that gun you are carrying"
LOL!! It is only now where the waters have been made
muddy regarding what the 2nd Amnd means. The Left Wing
in this country sees things in the Constitution that are
not there and tries deny things that are clearly there.
Like the 2nd Amnd.

Feb 8, 2013 10:52 am
 Posted by  Lou Sylvestri

Like it or not folks...you are the Militia..I don't got no stinking card!

Add your comment: