Fair   81.0F  |  Forecast »
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print

DA doesn’t file charges on Sassarini custodian

Nov 1, 2012 - 03:29 PM

Citing a lack of evidence, the Sonoma County District Attorney’s office declined to file charges on Thursday against Richard Piskulic, a longtime custodian at Sassarini Elementary School who was arrested on Oct. 5 on charges of child molestation.

“However, the case is ongoing and we will continue to investigate these allegations,” District Attorney Jill Ravitch told the Index-Tribune. “We encourage anyone who has information on this case to contact law enforcement, which I believe in this case is the Sonoma Sheriff’s Department.” 

The 53-year-old Vallejo resident’s defense attorney, Joe Stogner, said his client was “gratified” by Thursday’s decision not to file charges, and seemed surprised to hear the investigation would continue.

“I suppose there are some loose ends to tie up, but we’re confident the case will remain as it is today, which is unfiled,” Stogner said. “There are few things as terrifying as being falsely accused of a crime, especially if that person works for a school district… He’s been very touched by the support he’s received from friends and colleagues in a difficult time.”

The Index-Tribune did not receive immediate reaction from Sonoma Valley Unified School District Superintendant Louann Carlomagno, but will update the story when that information is available.

The case began on Oct. 4, when Sonoma police were notified after a Sassarini student told his parents the custodian touched his genitals while the pair were in one of the school’s bathrooms. The Sonoma County Sheriff's Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault Unit was brought in to assist with the investigation, which ultimately led to the arrest of Piskulic at his home. On Oct. 5, the school district contacted all Sassarini parents with a phone message notifying them that their children would bring home a sealed letter. That letter provided a brief description of the situation and instructed parents to discuss safety outside the home with their children. Piskulic has worked for the school for 31 years.

Ravitch said her office thoroughly investigated the allegations before deciding not to move forward with charges with the evidence available at this time.

“We evaluate the evidence, and we have a burden of proof to reach which was not met by the evidence we have today,” she said. “We don’t file charges until we have sufficient evidence to do so… I want to be very clear, the investigation is not over.”

She said her office would continue to work closely with the Sonoma County Sheriffs Department as the investigation continues. Stogner said he is hopeful Piskulic can return to work.

“We expect the (school) district to make a statement very shortly on this,” he said.

 

Please note: Your full name will be published with your comment.

Nov 1, 2012 08:09 pm
 Posted by  Mike White

Ms.Charrier-Botts; Regarding the case of Sassarini custodian Mr. Pisculic. Of course a child's safety and well being is of the greatest importance. With this in mind, I attended Mr Pisculic's arraignment thur. morning. Your article was fine, as far as it went. I would just offer one criticism. You left out one word that I heard the Judge say very clearly. It was the word EXONERATED. EXONERATED = shown to be blameless. This is very important. It does not mean he "got off". It means no blame. As an observer, I can only wish the best for all concerned. Mike White

Add your comment: