Fair   56.0F  |  Forecast »
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print

City backs ban on ‘corporate personhood’

Sep 6, 2012 - 05:52 PM

After listening to a dozen impassioned speakers, the Sonoma City Council voted unanimously Wednesday to support a federal initiative to end “corporate personhood.”

The council has been criticized in the past for taking stands on issues that do not directly affect the citizens of Sonoma. Councilman Ken Brown brought this issue to the council.

“I think this is appropriate for the council to address,” said Councilmember Steve Barbose. “I can’t separate out what’s local and not local. We have to stop the obscene spending that’s taking place in elections.”

The support is for Senate Joint Resolution 33, which proposes a constitutional amendment to repeal the Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision that gave corporations the same status as citizens in the matter of campaign contributions. It was introduced by U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and would exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons by the Constitution. It would also prohibit corporate spending in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the states to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election contributions and expenditures.

Speaking against the resolution was Fred Peterson of Sonoma who said unions’ rights might be stripped if corporations’ rights were stripped. “I understand that corporations are not people, but unions aren’t either.” He said the topic was not appropriate for council consideration.

Marty Bennett, a history professor at Santa Rosa Junior College, and a union member, said union members may opt out of having any part of their dues spent on political campaigns.

He also said that only 6 percent of workers are unionized, the lowest number since 1905. “Corporations outspend unions by 15-1,” he said.

Bob Baeyan noted that most large corporations are now multinational, meaning foreign interests are influencing our elections.

Councilmember Tom Rouse agreed that unlimited spending by multi-national corporations is “a bad thing.” The council is joined by Sebastopol, Petaluma, and the county Board of Supervisors in supporting the amendment. The action, taken by resolution, will be forwarded to the city’s Congressional representatives.

 

Please note: Your full name will be published with your comment.

Old to new | New to old
Sep 9, 2012 03:54 am
 Posted by  Robert Demler

Congratulations and thanks to the Sonoma City Council for having voted unanimously Wednesday to support a federal initiative to end “corporate personhood."

Robert Demler
Sonoma, CA

Sep 9, 2012 06:48 am
 Posted by  Robert Piazza

The city council has again over stepped their bonds by expressing an opinion on behalf of the voters of Sonoma. Senate Bill 33 is about a constitutional amendment. What authority or law gives city councils or county supervisors the authority to represent the will of the people in such matters?

Since the city is in financial straights as evidenced by the need for a sales tax, I suggest they expend their energy paying attention to governments fiscal health rather than that which they have no authority or control!

Sep 9, 2012 08:13 am
 Posted by  Clayton Wallis

Comment by Marty Bennett (an ultra progrsesive and avowed Communist), that "union members may opt out of having any part of their dues spent on political campaigns" is operationally untrue. Unions make it nearly impossible for individual members to take advantage of that option and if they do they are openly criticized and humiliated in public. Vote yes on Prop 32 and end union and government political corruption.

Postion of Sonoma City Council on such Federal and State issues is totally irrelevant and a waste of Taxpayer dollars.

Add your comment: