Fair   55.0F  |  Forecast »
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print

Arnold roundabout set for bid

Sep 17, 2012 - 07:40 PM
A RENDERING of what the planned roundabout on Arnold Drive at Hanna Boys Center would look like once completed.

A RENDERING of what the planned roundabout on Arnold Drive at Hanna Boys Center would look like once completed.

The proposed – and sometimes reviled – Arnold Drive roundabout at Agua Caliente Road is on schedule and could go out for bids around the first of the year.

  Last Tuesday, Sept. 11, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution for a mitigated negative declaration approving environmental documents and the $2.1 million project.

  Tom O’Kane, the county’s deputy director of Transportation and Public Works, said he expects to put the project out to bid around the first of the year, and that bids are usually advertised for about 90 days. That would mean, depending on weather, construction could start on the project in April or May of 2013.

  This project is being funded from a combination of Proposition 1B, Measure M and Sonoma Valley Traffic Mitigation funds. Proposition 1B was a transportation bond approved by voters statewide in 2006, while Measure M was a quarter-cent sales tax approved by county voters in 2004.

  The roundabout would replace a four-way stop.

  The property on the west side of the proposed roundabout belongs to Hanna Boys Center, which will realign its driveway to Agua Caliente Road as part of its $15 million capital improvement project.

  According to the resolution, the roundabout is designed to accommodate truck-turning movements by including rounded, or “traversable” curbs on the edge of the center island and truck apron. Native vegetation would be included in the center island, roadside trees would be retained where feasible and trees to be removed will be replaced with native oak trees and shrubs within the public right-of-way where space allows.

  The existing road shoulder of Arnold Drive and Agua Caliente Road will connect to the roundabout with a new 10-foot-wide, paved bike/pedestrian pathway. The new bike/pedestrian pathway is separated from the vehicular travel lanes that form the roundabout with 6-inch high curbs.

  The area between the curb and path will be surfaced with cobblestone or stamped concrete, offering a visual, textural separation for bikes or pedestrians. These rough surface textures are purposely designed to alert pedestrians and cyclists of adjacent vehicular travel lanes.

  Within the project limits, but beyond the shared sidewalk and bike path, Class II bike lanes will be constructed consistent with the Bikeways Plan. Splitter islands (separators) proposed in the middle of each vehicle travel lane would also be textured and include 6-inch-high curbs. These areas will not only separate the travel direction of vehicles, but also offer “refuges” for pedestrians crossing the roads, so that they only have to cross one direction of travel at a time.

  When the matter was being considered by the Sonoma Valley Citizens Advisory Commission in July 2011, a number of audience members opposed the project citing possible safety issues, concerns about truck traffic and the spoiling of a rural road with what was termed an “urban solution.” But the project also had its supporters including one who wanted another roundabout “down at Bonneau’s.”

 

Please note: Your full name will be published with your comment.

Old to new | New to old
Sep 18, 2012 03:12 pm
 Posted by  Arron Johnson

That's going to be a BIG screwed-up MESS! Why not just put-in a MUCH less expensive and MUCH better signal light? I guess we have money to blow in this county on crap like this? Freakin' STUPID liberal county planners!!! Hey, I have an idea; let's take out another lane in town and stick-in another bike lane like they did on 5th St. West because bike traffic really warranted it, and like Sonoma doesn't have enough car traffic or enough lanes as it is. God, where do these IDIOTS come from? Accidents WILL increase in that round about by 10 fold or more because of that pile of crap thing! People can’t even figure out who goes first at a basic stop sign intersection let alone when no one is coming to a complete stop and are whizzing around in one of those things. Whoever thought of this great idea needs a freakin' brain check! Just more proof that the people running this country couldn't find their butts with both hands! PRIORITIES!! Something stupid like this is NOT a prioroty. How about fixing some of the damn chuck holes & crappy roads that cost us money for tire, rim, and suspension repairs? Let me guess, someone in county planning has a relative or a friend that builds these stupid things and it's an inside rim job on tax payers to put this in, and then it'll cost us even more when it FAILS and we have to pay again to get rid of it and put-in a simple, less expensive traffic signal like we should have the first time around! Now ask me how I REALLY feel! LOL

Sep 18, 2012 08:27 pm
 Posted by  Debra Friedman

I agree.....with LOL. Fix the streets like Napa Road. STOP the big trucks from roaring through our Valley everyday. From Arnold, to East Napa, Broadway and the Freeway we call NAPA Road.
Worry about having Sonoma become a slow food city????? Not in the least.
We should demand a toll form all the trucks that come through our town to get over to 101 Petaulma or Santa Rosa. LOL 2

Sep 19, 2012 09:11 am
 Posted by  Lou Sylvestri

This particular location does not need a round-a-bout. Traffic is relatively light at all times. I use that route every day at different times & have never really had any delay to speak of.

I guess the powers to be think "Roundies" are fashionable.

Let's do some paving & forget this European jazz.

They can start with Broadway & Napa Rd. The holes have been there for well over a year & complaining does no good. All they tell you is that there are no funds available. Check out the southeast potholes, by the old gas station, next time you drive by.

First things first.


Thank you,

Sep 20, 2012 06:54 pm
 Posted by  Laurie Huff

I agree that this roundabout is a waste of money. The schools are unable to provide many of the classes that promote cultural or physical activities. Kids are obese for all of the reasons that we all know. Many of the county roads are disastrous.
I drive the intersection in question. It flows well and accidents are few. Putting in a roundabout will not prevent drinking and driving. Possibly we could spend what is obviously excess cash in teaching drivers how to actually STOP at a stop sign, bikes too.
Laurie

Add your comment: