Fair   58.0F  |  Forecast »
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print

A proposed response to the Batman Massacre

Op-ed

Sep 10, 2012 - 05:07 PM

I want to make an offer to my fellow Americans who may be, like me, still reeling from the worst “random” shooting the country has ever seen – the July 20 slaughter in Aurora, Colo. My question: Have you had enough? Because if you have, I can tell you how to stop this kind of madness. I know that’s a bold claim, but this is not a time for small measures.

  We can’t fix this tomorrow, because we didn’t cause it yesterday. We have been building up to this domestic holocaust since – to take one milestone – television was made available to the general public at the conclusion of World War II.

  If you are still with me, you are prepared to believe that it was not a coincidence that this massacre took place at the scene of an extremely violent, “long-awaited” movie. Psychologists have proved over and over again that – guess what – exposure to violent imagery produces disturbances in the mind that must, in course of time, take form in outward behavior. The imagery can be in any medium, nor does it matter whether on the surface of our minds we think what we’re seeing is real or made up. This is a natural, scientific law. Exactly who will crack next and in what setting is nearly impossible to predict, and in any case it’s ridiculous to try to run around stopping the resulting violence from being acted out after the mental damage has been done. The only sane approach is not to do it in the first place.

  As Lt. Col. Dave Grossman pointed out in his book, “Let’s Stop Killing Our Kids,” the video games that the Army uses to prepare ordinary men and women for combat – in other words to wipe out the normal empathy and inhibitions against hurting others that we’ve built up over millennia – are the very same games our young people buy across the counter throughout the country.

  Of course, there are other factors. At some point we will have to talk about readily available weapons; at some point we’ll have to realize that a nation that engages in heartless drone warfare, torture and extrajudicial killings cannot expect to live in peace. But until we liberate our minds from the endless pounding of violent imagery I fear we won’t be able to think clearly about those factors.

  With rare exceptions, film and video game producers will not stop turning out these dehumanizing products as long as there is profit to be made from them. But there is a way, one that has worked well on the small scales on which it has so far been tried: don’t watch them.

  After Aurora, police were posted at theaters where the same movie was being shown. But you have to ask yourself, what were they protecting? Is it perhaps the belief that violence is just entertaining? People, tell me when you’ve had enough.

Michael Nagler is a Gandhian scholar emeritus professor at UC Berkeley, and founder of Metta Center.

Please note: Your full name will be published with your comment.

Old to new | New to old
Sep 11, 2012 12:09 pm
 Posted by  Wayne Hardy

First off...let me say that I agree with some of what
you say. I do not agree with your mentioning the availility
of guns as being part of the problem. Latest data I read
showed that firearms are used more to prevent crimes (about
3 to 1)then they are used to commit crimes. The problem is
the way good-uses vs. bad-uses are portrayed in the media.
If stories of firearms used to save lives or prevent violent
are mentioned in Media outlets the never make front page
news. many times they are not even reported. But if you have
some wacko kill innocent people then it's reported on the front
page of newspapers or mentioned first on televised news. It is
flat biased reporting from my perspective. The Media has an
agenda to kill the Second Amendment.

I do agree with you points about violent shows, games, etc:
affecting the minds of children. Let me ask you a question
based on your opinion of this. If violence affects the minds
of children to the point where they want to, act-out that
violence, would you say that children exposed to pornography
could become sexual predators, rapists, child molesters and
practice other forms of sexual crimes? I find it interesting
that people on the Left (probably mostly due their hatred
of guns) speak out loudly against violence in the media but
want to defend the porno industry under the guise of protection
granted under First Amendment.

Sep 12, 2012 08:30 am
 Posted by  Phineas Worthington

I agree. Don't watch the videos nor play the games. Problem is there are far too many adults who can't say "NO" to their children and grandchildren.

And for pete's sake, this shooter showed so many red flags to so many people like so many other shooters, that there has to be some way for acquaintances to bring attention to authorities so at least a couple agents can go knock on the door and ask questions of suspects.

Sep 12, 2012 12:02 pm
 Posted by  Wayne Hardy

The problem is kids are left to raise themselves in many
circumstances. Couple that with the fact that many parents
just flat out don't care what their kids watch or do is
a blueprint for disaster.

Add your comment: